Drawing for HEAVYBIT

USPTO serial 85763941

HEAVYBIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEAVYBIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas H. Zellerbach and Kristin S. Cornuelle

THOMAS H. ZELLERBACH AND KRISTIN S. CORNUELLE ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST STE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614-8280UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in the design, development, provision and management of computer hardware and software in the business field; platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring computer software platforms for use in the design, development, provision and management of computer hardware and software in the business field; computer software development and computer programming development for others; design and development of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 22, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 22, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 31, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance