USPTO serial 85767570
OMEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MEXICO, D.F., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn E. Von Tersch
GLENN E VON TERSCH SVPCPO BOX 296BELMONT, CA 94002-0296UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, tequila; Liquor and liqueur beverages, namely, tequila; Tequila | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |