USPTO serial 85768823
TOPBLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOPBLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasant Grove, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Dellenbach
DAVID B. DELLENBACH WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Software; Software, namely, application software for mobile devices; Mobile phone applications in the field of music; Software music downloads; Music in digital form; Digital music downloadable from a global computer network; Musical sound recordings; Downloadable recordings featuring content in the field of music; Broadcasting services; Broadcasting services in the fields of internet broadcasting; Broadcasting in the fields of music and entertainment; Internet broadcasting services; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Entertainment services; Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests and tournaments in the fields of music and videos; Entertainment services in the nature of recording, production, and post-production services in the field of music; Providing a website at which artists can submit for judging in a talent contest performances in digital form showcasing their talent; Providing a website at which artists can upload music videos; Providing a website for individuals to provide music, music videos, lyric posts and/or communications regarding entertainment; Providing a website featuring news, information, music audio and video entertainment; Providing entertainment services in the field of music via internet; Music Production Services; Record production; Producing music; Production of sound recordings; Music concerts and shows provided via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Online social networking services in the field of music | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |