USPTO serial 85769474
LOLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Memphis, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Jeremy Craft and Andrew W. Chu
L JEREMY CRAFT CRAFT CHU PLLC1445 NORTH LOOP WSTE 410HOUSTON, TX 77008-4603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Plastic containers for organizing and storing cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |