USPTO serial 85769492
INNOVATIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4482729Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 2014
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INNOVATIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Daniel S. Brandwein, D.P.M. And Sean L. Kaufman, D.P.M.
Kenilworth, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Daniel S. Brandwein, D.P.M. And Sean L. Kaufman, D.P.M.
Daniel S. Brandwein, D.P.M. And Sean L. Kaufman, D.P.M.
Kenilworth, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Daniel S. Brandwein, D.P.M. And Sean L. Kaufman, D.P.M.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Physical therapy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel S. Brandwein, D.P.M. And Sean L. Kaufman, D.P.M.
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel S. Brandwein, D.P.M. And Sean L. Kaufman, D.P.M.
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named INNOVATIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |