USPTO serial 85773910
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary S. Mathew
Mary S. Mathew Dentons US LLPP.O. Box #061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for modifying the appearance and enabling transmission of photographs; computer software for uploading photographs and images to multiple photo sharing services; downloadable software for mobile entertainment, namely, software for downloading mobile games, ringtones, pictures, trivia games, and text; computer software for providing access to a blog and a social network; computer software for aggregating and integrating instant messaging accounts, email accounts, and social networking accounts; computer software for instant messaging, email, and social networking; downloadable computer software, namely, widgets for aggregating and integrating instant messaging accounts, email accounts, and social networking accounts; downloadable computer software, namely, widgets for instant messaging, email, and social networking; application skins for customizing a look and feel of a software application | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Wireless electronic transmission of ringtones, images, text, and information; signal transmission for electronic commerce and photosharing via telecommunication systems and data communications systems; wireless digital messaging services; telecommunication services, namely, the receipt and delivery of messages, documents, images and other data by electronic transmission; providing bulletin-board, message-board and chat-room services to users of photosharing, online dating, social introduction and social-networking services; electronic-mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring news, commentary and information in the fields of photosharing, social media, websites, instant messaging, email and technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a web site that gives users the ability to upload photographs; online services featuring application programming interface (API) software for photo sharing, engaging in social networking over a computer network, building social networking applications, and for uploading, managing, retrieving, and accessing data; technical support services, namely, providing help desk services in the field of computer software, namely, providing users with instructions and advice on the use of downloadable computer software, provided online, via a software application store, and via e-mail; computer services, namely, providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to manage their online photographs and social networking accounts; providing a website that features technology that enables users to modify the appearance of photographs, transmit and share photographs across multiple photo sharing platforms; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for modifying the appearance of photographs, transmitting and sharing photographs across multiple photo sharing platforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | On-line dating, social networking and introduction services; on-line computer databases featuring photographs, and information about individuals for dating and introduction purposes, consisting of relationships data about individuals, their contact information, personal characteristics, namely, skills, hobbies, interests, educational information, career information, health information, dating information, results of self assessment tests, and other personal information | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |