USPTO serial 85774614
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
28009 Madrid, ES
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Pérez-Guerrero
ARTURO PÉREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP O BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic shirts; Blouses; Body shirts; Button down shirts; Button-front aloha shirts; Camouflage shirts; Camp shirts; Clothing for athletic use, namely, padded shirts; Collared shirts; Dress shirts; Fishing shirts; Footwear; Golf pants, shirts and skirts; Golf shirts; Headgear, namely, hats and caps; Hooded sweat shirts; Hunting shirts; Knit shirts; Leather shirts; Long-sleeved shirts; Night shirts; Open-necked shirts; Over shirts; Pique shirts; Polo shirts; Rugby shirts; Shirt yokes; Shirts; Shirts for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Shirts for suits; Sports shirts; T-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |