USPTO serial 85774837
TOM CREAN'S LAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4632924Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2014
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOM CREAN'S LAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GRUDLANN CORCA DHUIBHNE TEORANTA
DINGLE, CO. KERRY, IE
GRUDLANN CORCA DHUIBHNE TEORANTA
DINGLE, CO. KERRY, IE
DINGLE, CO. KERRY, IE
Dublin 2, IE
Dublin 2, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
joseph A. ascoli
JOSEPH A. ASCOLI SKENE LAW FIRM, P.C.2614 ROUTE 516 FL 2OLD BRIDGE, NJ 08857-2306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer, ale and lager | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 20, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUDLANN CORCA DHUIBHNE TEORANTA
- Other trademarks owned by GRUDLANN CORCA DHUIBHNE TEORANTA
- Other trademarks owned by DINGLE BREWING COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Dingle Distillery Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Dingle Distillery Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TOM CREAN'S LAGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2014 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |