Drawing for LAROK

USPTO serial 85775231

LAROK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAROK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane Shay Wald

JANE SHAY WALD IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4276UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services and online retail store services featuring apparel, clothing accessories, home furnishings and home decor accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 24, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 4, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 23, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 23, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 23, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 23, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 23, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 23, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 23, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 22, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 18, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance