Drawing for ORIGINAL IPLANDSCAPE

USPTO serial 85776739

ORIGINAL IPLANDSCAPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, WILLIAM D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORIGINAL IPLANDSCAPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence H. Meier

LAWRENCE H. MEIER DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN ST STE 600BURLINGTON, VT 05401-8339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consulting services in the fields of acquiring, developing, managing, promoting, and leveraging intellectual property assets; business consultation services in the field of intellectual property, namely, extracting, mapping and analyzing a company's intellectual property portfolio in relation to issues affecting the company's business, markets, products, services, technology, inventions, and intellectual capital; business consultation services in the field of intellectual property, namely, creating a graphical representation, not automatically using computer, but rather facilitated iteratively in real time with representatives of a company, that identifies important issues affecting the company's business, markets, products, services, technology, inventions, and intellectual capital issues; business consultation services in the field of intellectual property, namely, mapping internal ideas, patent applications and patents of a company and patents and patent applications of others in a graphic format, and analyzing such ideas, patent applications and patents in relation to issues affecting the company's business, markets, products, services, technology, inventions, and intellectual capital; business consultation services in the field of intellectual property, namely, extracting, mapping and analyzing a company's intellectual property portfolio in relation to issues affecting the company's business, markets, products, services, technology, inventions, and intellectual capital and analyzing the relationship of such issues to intellectual property owned by third parties; business consultation services in the field of intellectual property, namely, presenting to a company a graphical representation of the company's intellectual property portfolio in relation to business issues affecting the company and in relation to intellectual property of third parties and providing recommendations concerning how best to address such issues; business consultation services in the field of intellectual property, namely, using a graphical representation of the company's intellectual property portfolio in relation to issues affecting the company and in relation to intellectual property of third parties as an input for IP strategy development; business consultation services in the field of intellectual property, namely, analyzing a company's intellectual property portfolio and depicting it graphically in relation to issues affecting the company's businessACTIVE—
042Product development services, namely, invention development; product development services, namely, invention development based on consideration of competitor's and partner's patents, publications, products and promotional materialsACTIVE—
045Intellectual property consultation, namely, consulting for others on how to develop and leverage intellectual property assets; consulting for others in the field of identifying viable inventions; intellectual property consultation in the field of advice on engineering around competitive intellectual propertyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 6, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 13, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 13, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 15, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 5, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance