Drawing for PISTON ENTERPRISE OS

USPTO serial 85777123

PISTON ENTERPRISE OS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PISTON ENTERPRISE OS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel

Sally M. Abel Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer operating systems relating to cloud based computing software, namely, operating system programs and utilities; computer programs for managing communications and data exchange between computers and electronic devices; computer operating system software for accessing and using cloud computing networks; network operating software relating to cloud computing; computer software development tools; computer software for developing and operating cloud computer networks and applications; computer software for use in database management; and computer software platforms for cloud computing networks and applications; all of the above excluding in the field of basketball and web site developmentACTIVE—
042technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of private cloud computing; providing on-line downloadable operating software for accessing and using a private cloud computing network; technical consulting services in the fields of data center architecture and private cloud computing solutions; all of the above excluding in the field of basketball and web site developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 21, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 21, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 1, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 6, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance