Drawing for PISTON ENTERPRISE OPENSTACK

USPTO serial 85777146

PISTON ENTERPRISE OPENSTACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PISTON ENTERPRISE OPENSTACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Martensen

MICHAEL MARTENSEN MARTENSEN IP30 E KIOWA ST STE 101COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903-1510UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer operating systems relating to cloud based computing software, namely, operating system programs and utilities; computer programs for managing communications and data exchange between computers and electronic devices; computer operating system software for accessing and using cloud computing networks; network operating software relating to cloud computing; computer software development tools; computer software for developing and operating cloud computer networks and applications; computer software for use in database management; and computer software platforms for cloud computing networks and applicationsACTIVE—
042technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of private cloud computing; providing on-line downloadable operating software for accessing and using a private cloud computing network; technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture and private cloud computing solutionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 20, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 19, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 6, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 21, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance