Drawing for LYNK

USPTO serial 85778132

LYNK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LYNK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott E. Taylor, Esq.

SCOTT E TAYLOR ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLP171 17TH ST NW STE 2100ATLANTA, GA 30363-1031UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Electronic funds transfer services; Credit card and debit card transaction processing servicesACTIVESep 28, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 9, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 9, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 25, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 20, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2018CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 22, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2018CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 1, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 1, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 1, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2017CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 12, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 12, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 20, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance