Drawing for NASH

USPTO serial 85778628

NASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. Burlingame

ROBERT B BURLINGAME PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPPO BOX 2824SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely, entertainment magazinesACTIVE—
038Radio and television broadcasting servicesACTIVE—
041Conducting award ceremonies; providing online publications in the nature of entertainment magazines; providing a website featuring online radio broadcasting, online television broadcasting, and entertainment news, events and informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 30, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 28, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 14, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 14, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 14, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 10, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance