USPTO serial 85778975
LA UNICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARER, ZACHARY R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA UNICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER LLC115 N HENRY STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Mexican corn tostadas prepared by deep frying, sold without toppings, and not bread or a bakery product | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |