Drawing for DXAG

USPTO serial 85779357

DXAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DXAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Martensen

MICHAEL MARTENSEN MARTENSEN IP30 E KIOWA ST STE 101COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903-1510UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, software operable to provide instance resiliency for prioritized and automated failover; software for instance failover, virtual machine failover and multisite instance failoverACTIVE—
042Technical support services associated with software operable to provide instance resiliency for prioritized and automated failover, namely, troubleshooting software issues; failover administration, and troubleshooting of web and database instances; providing back-up computer programs and facilities; 24/7 service desk/help desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance