USPTO serial 85781396
IPAYTAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IPAYTAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara H. Loewenthal
BARBARA H LOEWENTHAL GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN270 MADISON AVEFL 8NEW YORK, NY 10016-0601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; Business management; Business administration; Office functions | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of computer systems, computer architecture, software, software applications, and web sites; industrial design services and analysis and research services related thereto; design and development of computer hardware and software; services of creating and maintaining web-sites; hosting the web-sites of others; creation of web pages; the design, creation and hosting of merchant websites; creating and programming of software applications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |