USPTO serial 85781669
RCF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RCF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dean Palmer
Dean Palmer Dean Palmer IP Law & IProperty Inc.609 West Hastings StreetBox 32 - Suite 950Vancouver, V6B4W4Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | automotive lubricants for terrestrial and marine vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | automotive parts for terrestrial and marine vehicles, namely intake system components namely air filters, housings, pipes, pipe connectors, throttles, intake manifolds, resonators, and venturis as parts of engines, induction systems components namely turbochargers, superchargers, tubes, and pipes as parts of engines, engine management system components namely computers and sensors as parts of engines, exhaust system components namely manifolds, extractors, pipes, mufflers, resonators, and catalytic converters as parts of engines, pumps as parts of engines, heat exchangers as parts of engines, radiators as parts of engines, and plumbing equipment namely pipes and flexible tubes as parts of engines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | software for use in controlling the air-fuel ratio in an engine in on-board automotive computers for terrestrial and marine vehicles; computer hardware for on-board automotive computers for terrestrial and marine vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | automotive parts for terrestrial and marine vehicles, namely spoilers, air foils, trim tabs, propeller pitch adjustments, turbine pitch adjustments, attendant automatic or manual control systems, fairings, underbody trays and drive train components namely transmissions, transfer cases, differentials, drive shafts, half shafts, wheel bearing assemblies, hub assembles, propeller bearing drive assemblies, and final drive assemblies | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | online, retail and wholesale store services featuring automotive parts for terrestrial and marine vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | distribution services, namely, delivery of automotive parts for terrestrial and marine vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | recycling of automotive lubricants for terrestrial and marine vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | automotive diagnostic services for terrestrial and marine vehicles; quantitative analysis and monitoring of engine oil for quality control purposes for terrestrial and marine vehicles; automotive inspection services for terrestrial and marine vehicles; programming and configuration of on-board automotive computers for terrestrial and marine vehicles; testing and evaluation of automotive parts of others for terrestrial and marine vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Weir-Jones Engineering Consultants Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RCF
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |