Drawing for HEARD

USPTO serial 85782035

HEARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Gustav Olson

Peter Gustav Olson MAQS Law Firm AdvokatpartnerselskabPilestraede 58Copenhagen K, DK-1112DENMARK

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio headphones; Earphones and headphones; Educational apparatus, namely, a transparent tank used as a teaching aid for the chemical process of making alternative fuels; Handheld electronic units for adjusting sound levels in hearing aids; Headphones; Headphones including attached lanyard; Hearing protection headsets, not for medical use; Music headphones; Personal headphones for sound transmitting apparatuses; Personal headphones for use with sound transmitting systemsACTIVE—
010Electric hearing aids; Electrical hearing aids; Electrically operated hearing aids; Hearing aids; Sound processors adapted for use with prosthetic hearing devices; Wireless transmitters and receivers for use with hearing aidsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2014DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance