USPTO serial 85782939
PEACHFUZZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEACHFUZZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L. Sorey
CHRISTOPHER L. SOREY WYRICK ROBBINS YATES & PONTON, LLP4101 LAKE BOONE TRL STE 300RALEIGH, NC 27607-7525UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's apparel, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, running suits, swimwear, golf shirts, golf pants, ski wear; women's apparel, namely, shirts, skirts, pants, shorts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, running suits, swimwear, golf shirts, golf pants, golf skirts, ski wear; sports apparel, namely, sweat shirts, sweat pants, sweat suits, running suits, running shorts, golf shorts, swim wear, T-shirts, athletic shorts, hats and caps, wristbands, headbands, jackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |