USPTO serial 85783101
BACKUP PLAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BACKUP PLAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W. ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C.901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, contraceptives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |