USPTO serial 85784407
REDNECK RIVIERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDNECK RIVIERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen L Fancher, Esq., Joel R. Feldman, Esq., Jess L. Rosen, Esq.
JOEL R FELDMAN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLPTERMINUS 200 3333 PIEDMONT RD NESTE 2500ATLANTA, GA 30305-1780Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotel, bar and restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 9, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |