USPTO serial 85786166
WONDERBEER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5084508Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 2016
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WONDERBEER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Troisvierges, LU
Troisvierges, LU
Troisvierges, LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
Jeffrey H. Greger LOWE HAUPTMAN HAM & BERNER, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer; ale; lager; stout; porter; shandy; Beer-based cocktails; Beer-based coolers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | RPUB | NOA CANCELLED; REPUBLICATION REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |