USPTO serial 85786968
LINEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LINEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mihaela Hutanu
MIHAELA HUTANU SMITHS IP1367 West BroadwaySuite 400Vancouver, B.C., V6H4A7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Nut and seed based energy bars, yoghurt enrobed bars, fruit-based food bars, fruit-based meal replacement bars, nut and seed-based snack bars, fruit-based food bars also containing grains and nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chocolate enrobed food bars, cereal-derived ready to eat food bars, cereal-based energy food bars not for use as a meal replacement, granola-based snack bars, breakfast cereals, granola, oatmeal, hot oatmeal, waffles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |