USPTO serial 85787536
RETURN ON DIAGNOSTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RETURN ON DIAGNOSTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc.
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester K. Essig
LESTER K. ESSIG RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER, P.C.36 S STATE ST STE 1400SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing web-based tools, namely, software and search engines, to healthcare practitioners, payers and others for use in diagnostics, diagnostics management, creation and maintenance of diagnostic management systems and procedures, evaluation and assessment of current diagnostic business practices, and in providing guidance and recommendations in the fields of diagnostics, diagnostics management, laboratory management and operations, cost management, and diagnostic utilization review | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical counseling services; hospital medical counseling services; hospital admission counseling services; medical services, namely, diagnostic medical management counseling and patient care support services in the nature of counseling patients with respect to healthcare decisions and providing health care planning consultation with respect to disease management and disease management programs; medical case management, namely, providing medical services for individuals, and disease management consultation services; providing an on-line computer database in the field of healthcare used in connection with diagnosis, diagnostics and diagnostics analysis; providing medical and healthcare information online by computer and through communications networks and websites; providing medical information online to pathologists, physicians, healthcare executives, other healthcare practitioners and personnel, and others with respect to medical tests, test results, test analysis, test trends, test effectiveness, test advisability, test selection, test ordering, test ordering management, test ordering procedures, test ordering efficiency, test ordering effectiveness, medical utilization management services, medical conditions, health conditions, medical diagnosis and medical diagnostics; providing a website featuring information in the field of health, healthcare and medical diagnostics; and health care in the nature of medical services, healthcare medical services, health maintenance organization medical services, preferred provider organization medical services, fee for service medical services, and payer medical services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARUP LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ARUP LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named RETURN ON DIAGNOSTICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |