USPTO serial 85788721
MONSTER HIGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONSTER HIGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EL SEGUNDO, CA
EL SEGUNDO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATT SOLMON
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CANDY, SWEETS, AND CHEWING GUM | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |