USPTO serial 85788777
MEZZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEZZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Gregory, Jr.
RICHARD L. GREGORY, JR. IPR LAW GROUP PC5338 CORNISH STHOUSTON, TX 77007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive telepresence software platform as a conference room solution for integrating people, screens, devices, applications, and data into a single, networked, shared workspace and enabling participants in the workspace, regardless of location, to simultaneously present, manipulate and share in a collaborative computing session live content from their electronic devices, and import content from the web, enterprise cloud, or any source of electronic content, by providing spatially-aware interaction, collaboration, reachthrough control, application capture and sharing, and content capture and sharing during the collaborative computing session via shared connectivity among multiple users, multiple facilities in numerous locations, multiple displays, and multiple electronic devices, namely, portable computers, mobile devices, mobile phones, and tablet devices, web browsers, displays, applications, content and data; collection of electronic apparatus comprising electronic and processor devices, namely, televisions, monitors, projectors, portable computers, mobile devices, mobile phones, smart phones, and tablet devices, and display apparatus, namely, web based displays, mobile device displays, monitor displays, projector displays, mobile phone displays, and smart phone displays, forming a collaborative computing session for processing and displaying content contributed and manipulated in real time by multiple locally and remotely based session participants, said participants using and sharing content during a collaborative session across one or more said electronic apparatus and said display apparatus, said contributing and manipulating of content comprising reachthrough control, application capture and sharing, and content capture and sharing via shared connectivity among said session participants, said electronic apparatus and said display apparatus; computer software, computer software operating systems, computer programs and computer software for executable instructions for establishing collaborative computing sessions in a conference room solution; enabling interactive telepresence software platform for spatially-aware interaction, collaboration, reachthrough control, application capture and sharing, and content capture and sharing via shared connectivity among multiple users during a collaborative computing session, multiple facilities in numerous locations, multiple displays, and multiple electronic devices, namely, portable computers, mobile devices, mobile phones, and tablet devices, web browsers, displays, applications, content and data; computer software collaborative computing platform for integrating people, screens, devices, applications, and data into a single, networked, shared workspace and enabling participants in the workspace, regardless of location, to present, manipulate and share live content from their electronic devices, and import content from the web, enterprise cloud, or any source of electronic content | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2013 |
| 037 | Installing, maintaining and repairing electronic apparatus comprising electronic and processor based devices, namely, televisions, monitors, projectors, portable computers, mobile devices, mobile phones, smart phones, and tablet devices, and display apparatus, namely, web based displays, mobile device displays, monitor displays, projector displays, mobile phone displays, and smart phone displays, said electronic apparatus and display apparatus processing and displaying content contributed and manipulated in real time by multiple locally and remotely based session participants, said participants using and sharing content across one or more said electronic apparatus and said display apparatus, said contributing and manipulating of content comprised of reachthrough control, application capture and sharing, and content capture and sharing via shared connectivity among the electronic devices and the display apparatus | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2013 |
| 042 | Installing, maintaining and updating of computer software, said software for operating systems, computer programs and computer executable instructions, enabling an interactive telepresence platform for spatially-aware interaction, collaboration, reachthrough control, application capture and sharing, and content capture and sharing via shared connectivity among multiple users, multiple facilities in numerous locations, multiple displays, and multiple electronic devices including portable computers, mobile devices, mobile phones, and tablet devices, web browsers, displays, applications, content and data | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oblong Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Oblong Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MEZZ
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2016 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |