USPTO serial 85789404
MINI-MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINI-MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew B. Dernier
MATTHEW B DERNIER GIBSON & DERNEIR LLP900 ROUTE 9 NORTHSTE 504WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, instruments used for retraction and distraction of the spine during spinal surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 23, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |