USPTO serial 85789870
REDNECK RIVIERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDNECK RIVIERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen L. Fancher, Esq., Joel R. Feldman, Esq., Jess L. Rosen, Esq.
JOEL R FELDMAN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLPTERMINUS 200 3333 PIEDMONT ROAD NESTE 2500ATLANTA, GA 30305Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live and televised performances featuring musical, dance, dramatic, and comedic presentations; live music concerts; film, theater, radio, videotape and television program production services; entertainment in the nature of a continuing television drama series, entertainment in the nature of a continuing television comedy series; entertainment in the nature of television news shows; music publishing services; song writing services; audio recording and production; record and music production; recording studio services; magazine publication services; providing on-line non-downloadable general feature magazines; recreational camps; amusement parks; theme parks; art exhibitions; museums; dance instruction; dance events; entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of music; entertainment services, namely, providing information and commentary online in the field of music; providing online electronic newsletters in the field of music via e-mail; entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable playback of pre-recorded music via global computer networks, providing a website featuring non-downloadable video and graphics presentations featuring entertainment and music, and providing information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line; providing an Internet website portal featuring musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs and other multimedia materials, all in the field of music; fan club services; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the field of music and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 31, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 31, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 9, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |