USPTO serial 85790087
CTG ASIA CLEANING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2014
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CTG ASIA CLEANING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cleaning Technologies Group, LLC
Cincinnati, OH
Cleaning Technologies Group, LLC
Cincinnati, OH
Cleaning Technologies Group, LLC
Cincinnati, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl S. Scotney
CHERYL S. SCOTNEY KEATING MUETHING & KLEKAMP PLL1 E 4TH ST STE 1400CINCINNATI, OH 45202-3752UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Drum cleaning machines for cast, stamped, forged or extruded machine parts, featuring a drum to move parts through a process for cleaning; Conveyor machines; monorail conveyor machines; equipment for cleaning work pieces in process, namely, non-abrasive blast cleaning machines; tumbling cleaning machines for cleaning cast, forged, stamped, or extruded machine parts, featuring tumbling parts with or without media to clean and/or provide a surface finish; passivation systems comprising a plastic or stainless steel tank, featuring a process for removing free irons from parts; industrial solvent cleaning machinery; immersion cleaning systems comprising a tank or chamber for holding water for any cast, forged, stamped, or extruded machine parts with internal cavities; rotary basket cleaning machines for any cast, forged, stamped, or extruded machine parts that require spray, immersion or rotation for adequate cleaning or drying; rotary table cleaning machines incorporating moving parts through a machine in continuous or batch mode; ultrasonic conveyor machines; industrial fluid cleaning machinery comprised of agitated tanks, namely, agitating parts and solution to enhance cleaning; complete finishing systems, namely, machine tools in the nature of powered machines for finishing metals or other materials; multi-tank cleaning systems, comprising plastic or stainless steel tank for transferring a batch of parts through a series of cleaning tanks manually or automatically with or without ultrasonic cleaning; reverse osmosis systems comprised of pumps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cleaning Technologies Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cleaning Technologies Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cleaning Technologies Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named CTG ASIA CLEANING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |