Drawing for KIKBAX

USPTO serial 85790515

KIKBAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KIKBAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MIKE R. TURNER

MIKE R. TURNER NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG, LLP2 N LASALLE ST STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for use in facilitating the marketing and selling of personal use items by an individual, group or entity, namely, e-commerce software to allocate rewards or incentives to owners of personal use items in exchange for further promotion or sale of those items, either in person or via the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 2, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 13, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance