Drawing for MOSAIC

USPTO serial 85793006

MOSAIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MOSAIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel E. Kattman

Daniel E. Kattman Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.1000 N. Water St.Suite 1900Milwaukee, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for scoring writing assessment testsACTIVE—
041education services, namely, consulting services in the field of educational test scoring technology and preparing customized testsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 24, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 15, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 14, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 26, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 25, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 2, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 1, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 17, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 16, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 14, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 31, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 9, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance