USPTO serial 85793115
GROUND HAWG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 2, 2020
- Examiner
- TARCU, CATHERINE L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GROUND HAWG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
New Westminster, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Berenato, III
Joseph W. Berenato, III Calderon Safran & Cole P.C.7918 Jones Bridge Drive, Ste. 500McLean, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Vehicle washing services; Clean-up of vehicle washing residues | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Concrete recycling; waste water reprocessing services, namely, dewatering of vehicle washing residue, namely, the removal of sand, gravel, soil and other materials denser than water to facilitate recycling of the materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOCK-BLOCK LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LOCK-BLOCK LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LOCK-BLOCK LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Coobs Canada Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named GROUND HAWG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 30, 2020 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 28, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |