Drawing for ROYAL BABY

USPTO serial 85794853

ROYAL BABY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL BABY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Mark Blank, Esquire

RICHARD MARK BLANK, ESQUIRE RICHARD MARK BLANK, ESQUIRE19 LEDGEWOOD COMMONSMILLWOOD, NY 10546-1026UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Baby wipes, facial masks, compacts containing make-up, lip stick cases, cosmetics, fragranceACTIVE—
010Baby bottle holders in the nature of fabric slings worn by the person holding the baby; baby bottles, pacifiers for babies, pacifiers holders, namely, pacifier clips, soothers and tethers, namely, teething ringsACTIVE—
018Diaper bags; bags for carrying babies' accessories, namely, bags not specially adapted for carrying baby bottles; slings for carrying infants; baby carrier worn on the body; messenger bags; pouches of leather and textile; purses; handbags; pocket pouches of leather and textile; pocketbooks; clutches; backpacks; book bags; sports bags; bum bags; wallets; duffle bags; garment bags for travel; tote bags; shoulder bags; luggage; sack packs, namely, drawstring bags used as backpacks; evening handbags; evening bags; fashion handbags; gentleman's handbags; handbags for ladies; handbags for men; leather handbags; coin purses; small leather goods, namely, leather straps; make-up cases sold empty; cosmetic cases incorporating a hand mirror sold empty; leather key chains; briefcases; attaché casesACTIVE—
024Burping cloths, cotton cloths, bed sheets, bath towels, towelsACTIVE—
025Apparel, namely, shirts, pants, dresses, skirts, gowns, party dresses, suits, ties, knits, namely, knit bottoms and knit tops, sweaters, robes, underwear, pajamas, jumpers, bibs not of paper, leggings, scarves, gloves, outerwear, namely, coats and jackets, intimates, namely, bras and panties, hosiery, lingerie, underwear, socks, sleepwear, sun-wear, namely, sun leggings and sun sleeves, infant sleeper, swaddling clothes, christening gown, layette, baby gear, namely, baby pants, baby bodysuits, baby tops, baby bottoms, robes, pajamas, athletic uniforms, jackets, coats, dresses, skirts, tops, shirts, neckties, bow-ties, raincoats, winter coats, leather jackets, and, head gear, namely, caps, hats, derbies, felt hats and leather caps; wristbands, headbands, sleep masks, slippers; accessories, namely, belts; sportswear, namely, sports shirts and sports pants; footwear, athletic footwear, beach footwear, climbing footwear, flip flops, footwear for children, footwear for men, footwear for women, footwear for teens, footwear for men and women, dress footwear, pumps, high heel shoes, shoes, men's shoes, ladies shoes, work boots, hiking boots, snow boots, shoes, boots, sandals, sneakers, running shoes, slippers; robesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2014ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 23, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 15, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 2, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 3, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 24, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance