USPTO serial 85797553
FOODTRENDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOODTRENDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jarno J. Vanto
JARNO J. VANTO ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW BORENIUS LLP65 BROADWAY STE 1700NEW YORK, NY 10006-2503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Assistance, advice and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management and business organization relating to purchasing functions; Business consultation and management regarding marketing activities and launching of new products; Business consulting in the consumer products industry; Business data analysis; Business information management, namely, electronic reporting of business information, business analytics, namely, business investigations, evaluations, expert appraisals, information and research, trade spend business management; Business management consultancy in the field of purchases, namely, assisting businesses in improvement of purchasing functions; Business research; Business research services, namely, providing analysis of retail data on specific business locations; Business services, namely, consumer research and consulting related thereto; Collection of market research information; Compiling and analyzing statistics, data and other sources of information for business purposes; Computerized market research services; Consultation and advice for the purchase of musical instruments and sound recording devices; Consultation services in the field of company, business sector and industry data and research; Consumer marketing research and consulting related thereto; Consumer research; Information and data compiling and analyzing relating to business management; Market analysis and research services; Market segmentation consultation; Marketing services, namely, conducting consumer tracking behavior research and consumer trend analysis; Monitoring purchasing data, loyalty card data, and product data for business purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |