USPTO serial 85797584
HYPER JET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYPER JET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce H. Bernstein
BRUCE H. BERNSTEIN GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C.1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20191-1414UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Liquid precision measuring and discharging modules sold as an integral component of semiconductor manufacturing machines, and parts therefor; Painting machines and parts therefor; Food manufacturing machines for injecting, applying, adding and spraying of liquid, liquid-form or fluid food; Machinery and appliances for processing food and beverages, namely, electric food processors and aerated beverage making machines; Pumps, namely, centrifugal pumps, reciprocating pumps, rotary pumps, axial flow pumps and mixed flow pumps; Production and manufacturing equipment for semiconductor manufacturing, LED manufacturing, liquid crystal panel manufacturing, mounting substrate manufacturing, precision component assembling, metering supply for liquid materials of bonding agent, grease and the like, injection of additive in the food field, and writing letters and drawing patterns on the surface of electronic components, electronic substrates, the faces of watches and clocks, and foods such as confectionary and the like, namely, non-contact injecting and discharging machines for protein substances, biological samples, special reagents, water solutions, solvents, alcohol solutions, solvent media, liquid crystals, inks, oils, magnetic fluids and the like | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Automatic pipetting and suction machines for laboratory research use; Laboratory equipment for use in scientific, research, and educational institutions, namely, non-contact injecting and discharging machines for protein substances, biological samples, special reagents, water solutions, solvents, alcohol solutions, solvent media, liquid crystals, inks, oils, magnetic fluids and the like; Physical and chemical machinery and appliances, namely, machines for dripping liquid onto plates, glass slides and chips having multi-arrays that can be used in chemical analysis, biological analysis or patterning for scientific laboratory or medical research use; Metering pumps for liquids, namely, resins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MUSASHI ENGINEERING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MUSASHI ENGINEERING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HYPER JET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |