USPTO serial 85797702
CRYPTANIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2017
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRYPTANIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
DALLAS, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen A. Webb, Esq.
Karen A. Webb, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041-1990Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software used to protect sensitive information, digital assets, intellectual property and services; Computer software used to protect sensitive information, digital assets, intellectual property and services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 20, 2013 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, secure implementations of cryptographic algorithms, keys, protocols and systems to enable trusted security services in insecure hardware environments like mobile devices, desktops, embedded systems and tablet PCs; Consulting services in the field of the design and implementation of cryptographic systems; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting and advice in the nature of diagnosing, implementing and repairing cryptographic systems in computer software; Computer services, namely, providing cryptographic and security services in the nature of secure implementations of cryptographic algorithms, protocols, services and systems to enable users to secure their sensitive information, digital content, intellectual property and security systems in insecure computer hardware environments, such as mobile devices, desktops, embedded systems and tablet PCs; Computer security consultancy in the field of integrity protection, obfuscation and anti-hacking; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting and advice for software systems in the nature of diagnosing, implementing and repairing software for integrity protection, obfuscation and anti-hacking; Computer services, namely, providing cryptographic and computer security services in the nature of secure implementations of integrity protection, obfuscation and anti-hacking protocols and procedures for various software applications to enable users to secure their sensitive information, digital content, intellectual property and security systems in insecure computer hardware environments, such as mobile devices, desktops, embedded systems and tablet PCs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 20, 2013 |
| 045 | Computer security services in the nature of administration of digital keys and digital certificates; Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by whiteCryption Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by whiteCryption Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by whiteCryption Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ZIMPERIUM, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CRYPTANIUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |