Drawing for WONDERTRIBE

USPTO serial 85798001

WONDERTRIBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WONDERTRIBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry S. Clegg

PERRY S. CLEGG KUNZLER, PC50 W. Broadway, Suite 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, group coaching and teaching in the fields of holistic healing, self-reliance, agriculture, sustainability, and inspirational and motivational trainingACTIVEJul 31, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 21, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 21, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance