USPTO serial 85799198
SAINT LAURENT PARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAINT LAURENT PARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M. COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562-5615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery; perfumes; eau de parfum; toilet water; eau-de-Cologne; beauty products, namely, mascara, blusher, make-up powder, cosmetic pencils, eye shadow, make-up bases, foundation, face and beauty masks, lipsticks, nail varnish and nail varnish removers, lotions, creams and other preparations for removing make-up; toiletries, namely, shampoos, bath salts, bath and shower gels, foam baths, toilet soaps and cakes of soap, essential oils for personal use; hair lotions; creams and mousses for shaving, after-shave lotions and balms; dentifrices; non-medicated sun care preparations, namely, oils, milks, lotions and creams, self-tanning creams, products for tanning the skin; cosmetics; non-medicated preparations for skin, face, body, eye, lip, neck, leg and foot care; anti-wrinkle creams; body and face creams, milks, lotions, gels and powder; cleansing creams; deodorants for body care; cleaning preparations; all of these products being of French origin or manufactured in France | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles, scented candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Small utensils and portable containers, neither of precious metal nor plated therewith, namely, shaving brushes, stands for shaving brushes, metal boxes for distributing paper towels for household use, untangling combs, purse perfume sprayers and bag perfume sprayers sold empty, toothpicks, toothbrushes, toothbrush cases, toothbrush holders; soap boxes, tooth brush glass cups, lipstick brushes; eyebrow brushes; make-up brushes; brushes for toiletry use; brush-making materials; cosmetic utensils, namely, brushes; powder puffs, combs, comb cases; powder compacts, not of precious metal; nail brushes; hairbrushes; applicators for cosmetic products, namely, cosmetic sponges; sponges for toilet purposes, sponge holders; soap dishes; dispensers for liquid soap and dentifrice; holders for room fragrances; fragrance burners; small bottles, not of precious metal, sold empty; perfume atomizers or perfume sprays sold empty; pots for cream sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by YVES SAINT LAURENT PARFUMS
- Other trademarks owned by YVES SAINT LAURENT PARFUMS
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SAINT LAURENT PARIS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |