USPTO serial 85802165
INDIVAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INDIVAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
Stacey R. Halpern Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and medical preparation for anti-retroviral treatments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |