Drawing for SPOKES

USPTO serial 85802556

SPOKES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ULRICH, NANCY G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPOKES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mathew J. Temmerman

MATHEW J. TEMMERMAN TEMMERMAN LAW OFFICE423 E STDAVIS, CA 95616-4132UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for creating a visual and functional reorientation of the screen of the mobile device and for aggregating data on the mobile deviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 22, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 13, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 4, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 20, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 17, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 30, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 2, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance