Drawing for DISH

USPTO serial 85805332

DISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian L. Saffer

IAN L. SAFFER KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1400 WEWATTA ST STE 600DENVER, CO 80202-5549UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital video recorders; Electronic apparatus and devices for controlling access to pay-television services; Communications equipment, namely, set-top boxes for receiving video programming; Television receivers; Satellite receivers; Set-top boxes; Universal remote controls for home electronic devices, namely, televisions, VCRs, DVD players, digital video recorders, satellite receivers, stereo receivers, and stereo amplifiers; Computer hardware and software for streaming audio, video, image and data information to a variety of network devices, namely, personal computers, mobile phones, personal digital assistants (PDA), and stand-alone hardware decoders, namely, audio decoders and video decoders; electronic devices, namely, digital media streaming devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 16, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 15, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance