USPTO serial 85805637
BOUNCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOUNCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
Burton S. Ehrlich LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604-2508Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Entertainment services in the nature of live acrobatic and multimedia shows on the theme of rebound | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |