Drawing for PANTHER

USPTO serial 85806513

PANTHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PANTHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Holly Pekowsky, Esq.

HOLLY PEKOWSKY, ESQ. AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009turnkey, user-deployable, pre-configured security system packaged for travel consisting primarily of wireless intrusion sensors for security alerts, and/or video camera(s) for security alerts or verification of sensor alerts for the protection of people or assets in temporary locations which may be locally monitored through its receiver intrusion/video interface or remotely monitored through cellular and internet connectionsACTIVEOct 31, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 9, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 8, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance