USPTO serial 85806622
MONSTER MOBILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONSTER MOBILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas L. Kautz
THOMAS L KAUTZ GRAYROBINSON PAPO BOX 2328FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33303-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | mobile retail store and wholesale distributorship services featuring automotive and industrial tools, supplies and equipment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |