USPTO serial 85807027
FOCUS MICROSCOPE CAMERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4437721Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2013
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOCUS MICROSCOPE CAMERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin S. Costanza
EXO LABS INC14512 SOUTHEAST 49TH STREETBELLEVUE, WA 98006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras; systems for use in displaying objects seen through a microscope or telescope, primarily comprising a camera, a mount for coupling the camera to an eyepiece, electric cables for coupling the camera to a monitor, and associated software for analyzing and sharing images and data | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 29, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |