USPTO serial 85807931
CORTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah Otte Graber
SARAH OTTE GRABER WOOD, HERRON & EVANS LLP441 VINE ST STE 2700CINCINNATI, OH 45202-2814UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for communicating, operating and controlling necessary subsystems and components in said vehicles vessels and crafts; instruments, devices, computers and computer software for optimizing data sharing within combat vehicles, crafts and vessels and facilitating optimal data flow among military commands, namely, computers and computer hardware, computer networks, switches, displays, data servers, hard drives, video processing equipment, hubs, intercom systems, radio interface control switches, human control interfaces, power distribution units, power supply units, and computer software for communicating, operating and controlling necessary subsystems and components in said vehicles vessels and crafts; instruments and, devices, namely, computer hardware and peripherals, computers and computer software for use on measuring, navigation, communication, signalling, control, monitoring of vehicles, means of transport, armed forces, armoured vehicles, armed personnel vehicles, firearms, ammunition, missiles, explosives, fireworks, weapon systems, remote operated weapon systems and combat vehicles; excluding integrated circuits, microprocessors, microprocessor cores, macro cells, microcontrollers, bus interfaces at the printed circuit board level and evaluation and testing printed circuit boards, all being integrated circuit based devices; excluding computer software used in, and for use in the design and development of integrated circuits, microprocessors, microprocessor cores, macro cells, microcontrollers, bus interfaces and evaluation and testing printed circuit boards, all being integrated circuit based devices; and excluding computer software used in, and for use in the design and development of, application software and operating system software to run on integrated circuit based devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Means of transport for use on land, in the air or in the water, namely, armoured vehicles and armed personnel vehicles in the nature of military vehicles, namely, automobiles, trucks, vans, ambulance vehicles, reconnaissance vehicles, rescue vehicles, recovery vehicles, command vehicles, decontamination vehicles, land mine detection vehicles, combat vehicles in the nature of combat land vehicles, transport vehicles, land mine detection vehicles, military land vehicles, maritime command vehicles, submarines, ships, crafts and vessels, amphibious vehicles, decontamination vehicles, and ambulance vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Firearms, ammunition and missiles; fireworks; Weapon systems comprised of ballistic weapons, projectiles, grenades, bombs, tear gas weapons, guns, munitions, magazines for weapons, rocket launchers, missile launchers, trunnions for weapons, firing platforms, weapon cartridges and shells, releasing apparatus for grenades, bomb and the like, projecting apparatus for grenades, bombs, and the like, loading tools for weapons, namely loading blocks and recappers, all of the above used together or separately in combination with integrated battle-management computers, radars, sensors, effectors, and communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS
- Other trademarks owned by Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Similar marks named CORTEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |