USPTO serial 85808959
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester K. Essig
LESTER K ESSIG RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER PC36 S STATE STSTE 1400SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1451| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services, computerized online ordering services, online ordering services, telephone ordering services, and e-mail ordering services in the fields of shoes, running shoes, cross training shoes, track and field shoes, walking shoes, athletic shoes, shoe accessories, shoe cleats, shoe spikes, clothing, apparel, active wear, sportswear, shirts, tee shirts, tank tops, sports tops, sweatshirts, coats, jackets, pants, sweatpants, knee pants, capris, shorts, sports bras, socks, hats, caps, headbands, gloves, hydration systems, water bottles, insoles, muscle treatment devices, muscle massage devices, compression arm sleeves, compression leg sleeves, nutritional supplements, dietary supplements, reflective safety vests, reflective safety bands, and skin care products, and gift cards for purchasing the foregoing items | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 2004 |
| 041 | Athletic consulting and training services, namely, providing consultation about athletic equipment in the nature of footwear, featuring the fitting of shoes, running shoes, cross training shoes, track and field shoes, walking shoes, and athletic shoes in connection therewith; and organizing and conducting community running events | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |