USPTO serial 85808999
BANKINTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BANKINTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
28046 Madrid, ES
28046 Madrid, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK FABER LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | (Based on Spanish Reg. 944789 ) Financial services, namely, banking services, mortgage loan services, financial planning services, investment banking services, insurance services, namely, underwriting life, health, accident, fire, home and mortgage insurance, and bill payment services | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | (Based on Spanish Reg. 2917137) Telecommunication and communication services, namely, television and radio broadcasting services, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, telephone communication services, paging services, text and numeric wireless digital messaging services, wireless digital messaging services, wireless facsimile mail services, wireless PBX services, wireless voice mail services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |