USPTO serial 85809504
VANGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VANGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Brucker
WILLIAM J. BRUCKER STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metallic laser engravable labels, tapes, foils and films; metallic labels, tapes, foils and film with holographic elements; metallic labels tapes, foils and film for receiving printed material; metallic printable or laser engravable tamper evident labels, tapes, foils and film; metallic printable or laser engravable labels capable of hot stamp application or lamination; all of the foregoing goods are for use as features for identification and authentication of individuals, credentials, documents and products | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Radio frequency identification (RFID) cards and smart cards all with optical security features including, holographic elements, laser etching, security patterns, micro-images and/or tamper evident structures or combinations of the forgoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Customized plastic identification badges printed with optical security features including, holographic elements, laser etching, security patterns, micro-images and/or tamper evident structures or combinations thereof; paper laser engravable labels, tapes, foils and films; paper labels, tapes, foils and film with holographic elements; paper labels, tapes, foils and film for receiving printed material; paper printable or laser engravable tamper evident labels, tapes, foils and film; paper printable or laser engravable labels capable of hot stamp application or lamination; all of the foregoing goods are for use as features for identification and authentication of individuals, credentials, documents and products | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Laminates in the nature of plastic and metallic foils with holographic elements, laser etching, security patterns, micro-images and/or tamper evident structure or combinations thereof; Laminates in the nature of plastic and metallic stamping foils, namely, hot stamping foils and cold stamping foils; all of the foregoing goods are for use as features for identification or authentication of individuals, credentials, documents and products | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic laser engravable labels, tapes, foils and films; plastic labels, tapes, foils and film with holographic elements; plastic labels, tapes, foils and film for receiving printed material; plastic printable or laser engravable tamper evident labels, tapes, foils and film; plastic printable or laser engravable labels capable of hot stamp application or lamination; all of the foregoing goods are for use as features for identification and authentication of individuals, credentials, documents and products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HID Global Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by HID Global Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named VANGO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |